Monday, September 04, 2006

Conventional Medicine Victims

Please read this story below if you are in any way still thinking that conventional medicine has any clue about how to treat chronic diseases. Things are really in bad shape in this country with medical care and you can only hope to God you don't find out for yourself the hard way.

Dr Russel Blaylock lost his brother to medical mistreatment of cancer

The worst thing that could happen to me would be to somehow end up in a hospital and lose control of what enters my body and what is done to it. I didn't feel this way when I was a kid. I trusted doctors and hospitals. Now I see their limitations and their short sightedness. They don't know about new research. They keep doing the "protocol" passed down by the almighty AMA and until their cult leaders tell them differently, they continue down the path blindly, doing the same ineffective treatments to more and more patients.

Found this information posted in a forum. It contains verifiable references.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What doctors say about Chemo Therapy

There is no scientific evidence for chemotherapy being able to extend in any appreciable way the lives of patients suffering from the most common organic cancers, which accounts for 80% of all cancers? (Dr Ulrich Abel. 1990)

"Most cancer patients in this country die of chemotherapy…Chemotherapy does not eliminate breast, colon or lung cancers. This fact has been documented for over a decade. Yet doctors still use chemotherapy for these tumours…Women with breast cancer are likely to die faster with chemo than without it."—Alan Levin, M.D.


"We have a multi-billion dollar industry that is killing people, right and left, just for financial gain. Their idea of research is to see whether two doses of this poison is better than three doses of that poison."—Glen Warner, M.D. oncologist.

"As a chemist trained to interpret data, it is incromprehensible to me that physicians can ignore the clear evidence that chemotherapy does much, much more harm than good."---Alan Nixon, Ph.D., Past President, American Chemical Society.

"We know that conventional therapy doesn’t work—if it did you would not fear cancer any more than you fear pneumonia. It is the utter lack of certainty as to the outcome of conventional treatment that virtually screams for more freedom of choice in the area of cancer therapy. Yet most so-called alternative therapies regardless of potential or proven benefit, are outlawed, which forces patients to submit to the failures we know don’t work, because there is no other choice.



What the National Cancer Institutes OWN studies say about the toxic treatments they approve for cancer

A report from the Southern Research Institute, dated April 13, 1972, based upon research conducted for the National Cancer Institute, indicated that most of the accepted drugs in the American Cancer Society’s "proven cure" category produced cancer in laboratory animals that previously had been healthy! (NCI research contract PH-43-68-.998. Information contained in letter from Dean Burk to Congressman Lou Frey, Jr., May 30,1972; Griffin, Private Papers, op. cit., p. 5.)

"A study of over 10,000 patients shows clearly that chemo’s supposedly strong track record with Hodgkin’s disease (lymphoma) is actually a lie. Patients who underwent chemo were 14 times more likely to develop leukemia and 6 times more likely to develop cancers of the bones, joints, and soft tissues than those patients who did not undergo chemotherapy (NCI Journal 87:10)."


What other medical Journals have to show in their studies:

Children who are successfully treated for Hodgkin's disease are 18 times more likely later to develop secondary malignant tumours. Girls face a 35 per cent chance of developing breast cancer by the time they are 40----which is 75 times greater than the average. The risk of leukemia increased markedly four years after the ending of successful treatment, and reached a plateau after 14 years, but the risk of developing solid tumours remained high and approached 30 per cent at 30 years (New Eng J Med, March 21, 1996)

"The five year cancer survival statistics of the American Cancer Society are very misleading. They now count things that are not cancer, and, because we are able to diagnose at an earlier stage of the disease, patients falsely appear to live longer. Our whole cancer research in the past 20 years has been a failure. More people over 30 are dying from cancer than ever before…More women with mild or benign diseases are being included in statistics and reported as being "cured". When government officials point to survival figures and say they are winning the war against cancer they are using those survival rates improperly."---Dr J. Bailer, New England Journal of Medicine


Little known fact about survivor rates in those who opt for toxic cancer treatments verses those who didn't do anything....


Did you know that 30 years ago Dr Hardin B. Jones, Professor of Medical Physics & Physiology at Berkeley, found that the life expectancy of untreated cancer cases appears to be FOUR TIMES LONGER than that of treated individuals?

1969 Science Writers Conference of the ACS

They KNEW this 30 years ago and yet these barbaric life threatening toxic procedures continue.

With some cancers, notably liver, lung, pancreas, bone and advanced breast, our 5 year survival from traditional cancer therapy alone is virtually the same as it was 30 years ago.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Please check this link for more detailed information from Dr Ulrich Abel

No comments: